COVID 5 Years On: Evaluating the Response and the Transformations in Healthcare Since the Pandemic

A REPORT critically analysing the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic on East Africa’s communities.

Abstract

COVID-19, caused by the SARS-Cov-2 virus, emerged as a global pandemic, disrupting societies  and economies worldwide. Five years later, East Africa continues to navigate the lasting effects of  the crisis, particularly within its healthcare systems. This report evaluates the region’s response,  assessing both immediate interventions and long-term transformations. Early measures, such as  border closures, community-driven awareness campaigns, and digital health innovations, played a  crucial role in controlling initial outbreaks. However, systemic challenges, including inadequate  healthcare infrastructure, misinformation, and economic disruptions, hindered sustained resilience. Over time, the crisis accelerated healthcare reforms, driving advancements in telemedicine, public  health policies, and regional cooperation. This report highlights key lessons learned, emphasising the need for continuous investment in healthcare, stronger cross-border collaboration, and adaptive  policy frameworks to enhance preparedness for future global health emergencies. 

Introduction 

COVID-19, once seen as a distant threat, quickly evolved into a global crisis that reshaped  societies, economies, and healthcare systems. While its immediate effects were felt in  overwhelmed hospitals and rising infection rates, the pandemic’s broader impact extended to  economic instability, disrupted supply chains, and shifts in public health policies. In East Africa,  the crisis exposed vulnerabilities in healthcare infrastructure, economic resilience, and pandemic  preparedness. Countries like Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania faced unique challenges and  implemented diverse strategies in response to the outbreak, each with varying degrees of success. 

Before the pandemic, healthcare systems in the region primarily relied on in-person  consultations, with limited telemedicine infrastructure and a shortage of critical care facilities.  Kenya took a balanced approach, introducing partial lockdowns while leveraging mobile  technology to facilitate contact tracing and digital health consultations. Tanzania adopted a  controversial stance under its former leadership, initially downplaying the severity of the virus  and resisting lockdowns, which led to a lack of transparency in reporting cases. However, a shift  in policy under new leadership saw renewed efforts in vaccination campaigns and public health  awareness.

The economic consequences of the pandemic were equally profound. With tourism contributing  significantly to GDP, countries like Tanzania and Kenya saw sharp declines in revenue due to  global travel restrictions. Small businesses, which form the backbone of many East African  economies, struggled as supply chains were disrupted. When COVID-19 struck, Uganda swiftly  implemented some of the strictest lockdown measures in Africa, including early border closures  and nighttime curfews, which helped curb initial infection rates but severely impacted  livelihoods in the informal sector. Uganda’s heavy reliance on cross-border trade meant that  stringent movement restrictions affected both food security and business continuity. However,  the crisis also accelerated innovation—Kenya witnessed a surge in mobile money transactions as  digital payment systems became crucial for reducing physical contact, and Tanzania expanded  local production of medical supplies, reducing dependence on imports. 

Understanding how East Africa responded to COVID-19 is essential for preparing for future  health emergencies. The pandemic highlighted the importance of adaptability, early intervention,  and resilient healthcare systems. While community-led initiatives, mobile health innovations,  and localised supply chains proved effective in some areas, other strategies, such as prolonged  lockdowns, exposed economic vulnerabilities. By analysing what worked and what did not, this  report aims to critically analyse the impact the global pandemic had on East Africa’s  communities.

Methodology

Understanding how healthcare systems have adapted since the COVID-19 pandemic requires an  in-depth exploration of key areas: infrastructure, pandemic preparedness, vaccination rollout and  public trust, and the role of digital health and surveillance. This report assesses the effectiveness of responses, the challenges encountered, and the pandemic’s lasting impact on regional  healthcare. The report mainly employs qualitative methods, justified by the need to evaluate broader social  and structural shifts within healthcare since the outbreak. Where a quantitative approach may  have been useful for statistical tracking, it would not have produced a necessarily nuanced  understanding of shifts in policy, attitudes, and healthcare systems. Notably, secondary data was favoured over primary data due to rich, readily available literature on contemporary trends and  policies, including relevant national and regional government reports, policy documents, and  news and academic publications. The research also draws from and compares existing expert  analyses, which allowed for a well-rounded analysis of the situation. 

The articles chosen were focused on East Africa and provided regional or cross-country  comparisons where possible; they specifically examined healthcare infrastructure, vaccination  campaigns, public sentiment, or advancements in telemedicine. To ensure relevance, only  articles that were published in the last ten years were used, and all were drawn from reputable  institutions or publications. 

To extract the most meaningful insights, the study employed thematic content analysis to identify  themes such as shifts in healthcare investments or policy attitudes toward vaccination. To  evaluate healthcare infrastructure and pandemic preparedness, the report drew from a  combination of meta-reviews, time-series analyses and expert commentaries to extract themes  related to emergency response strategies and systemic strengths and weaknesses. For vaccination  rollout and trust, the report relied on national news publications to assess public feeling. The  report coded for themes such as panic, optimism, misinformation or government credibility,  allowing for a deeper understanding of how public trust in healthcare measures changed over  time. Finally, for digital health and surveillance, the report focused on scholarly reviews that  measured the quality and efficacy of telemedicine and surveillance efforts in the region,  including cross-country comparisons. By systematically coding for recurring patterns, the report  was able to make distinct conclusions on the past and present of the healthcare system’s capacity  to respond to health emergencies, and hypothesise strategies discussed at the end of each section  to enhance it in the future.

Continue reading the full report by clicking HERE.